Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Rev. ADM ; 80(2): 82-88, mar.-abr. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1513211

ABSTRACT

Introducción: las fosas y fisuras son áreas formadas por delgadas irregularidades de la capa del esmalte de la superficie oclusal. La compleja morfología en dientes posteriores es un determinante biológico asociado al desarrollo de caries. Objetivo: evaluar el efecto de diversas formas de tratar la morfología oclusal en la adaptación y penetración de materiales utilizados en restauraciones preventivas. Material y métodos: diseño experimental e in vitro. Sesenta terceros molares fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en dos grupos: surco sin ameloplastia y con ameloplastia; además, contaban con acondicionamiento del esmalte que se subdividió en tres subgrupos: 1) sellador de fosas y fisuras, 2) adhesivo/sellador de fosas y fisuras y 3) adhesivo/ resina Flow. Resultados: los subgrupos adhesivo/sellador y adhesivo/ Flow alcanzaron mayores valores de adaptación íntima a las paredes del surco. Las diferencias fueron significativas entre los materiales (p = 0.0009). Las mayores zonas de desadaptación resultaron para el sellador sin y con ameloplastia. La penetración de los materiales fue mayor en los surcos con ameloplastia. En los surcos tratados con ameloplastia, el adhesivo/Flow reveló el mayor porcentaje de penetración y la mejor adaptación a las paredes del surco. Conclusiones: la penetración del material está positivamente correlacionada con la profundidad del surco. El sellador con y sin ameloplastia mostró pobre adaptación a las paredes del surco (AU)


Introduction: pits and fissures are areas formed by fine irregularities in the enamel layer of the occlusal surface. The complex morphology in posterior teeth are biological determinants associated with the development of caries. Objective: to evaluate the effect of various ways of treating occlusal morphology on the adaptation and penetration of materials used in preventive restorations. Material and methods: experimental design, in vitro. Sixty third molars were randomly distributed into two groups: groove without ameloplasty and with ameloplasty, with enamel conditioning with three subgroups: 1) pit and fissure sealer, 2) adhesive/pit and fissure sealer, 3) adhesive/resin flow. Results: the adhesive/sealant and adhesive/flow subgroups reached higher values of intimate adaptation to the furrow walls. The differences were significant between the materials (p = 0.0009). The largest areas of maladjustment were found for the sealant without and with ameloplasty. The penetration of the materials was greater in the grooves with ameloplasty. In the grooves treated with ameloplasty, the adhesive/flow revealed the highest percentage of penetration and the best adaptation to the walls of the groove. Conclusions: the penetration of the material is positively correlated with the depth of the furrow. The sealant with and without ameloplasty showed poor adaptation to the sulcus walls (AU)


Subject(s)
Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Preventive Dentistry/methods , Composite Resins/therapeutic use , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , In Vitro Techniques , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Molar, Third/anatomy & histology
2.
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 22: e210193, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1422269

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) and bracket failure rates (BFR) of orthodontic brackets bonded with Light Cure adhesive against those bonded with Self Cure adhesive. Material and Methods: The study had in vitro and in vivo parts. In the in vitro part to determine SBS of Light Bond(LB)(R) and Rely.a.Bond(RB)(R) adhesives used in bonding brackets to 88 extracted teeth, each adhesive type was used to bond 44 brackets. The clinical study was conducted to determine the BFR of the LB(R) and RB(R) adhesives by bonding 256 teeth using each adhesive type. A standardized bonding procedure was followed in both the in vitro and in vivo parts of the study. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, independent t-test, chi-square, and Pearson Correlation statistics. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 21.0 was used to analyze the data generated. Results: There was a significantly higher mean SBS 10.6MPa for LB(R) adhesive than the 7.0MPa of the RB(R) adhesive. In the in vivo study, (LB)(R) had a greater but not significant BFR of 9.0% than RB(R) (8.0%). No significant relationship existed between the SBS of either adhesive type (as determined in vitro) and their BFR in vivo. Conclusion: Higher SBS of LB(R) did not translate to less BFR in the clinic, nor did a lower SBS of RB(R) translate to more BFR in the clinic (AU).


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Shear Strength , In Vitro Techniques/methods , Chi-Square Distribution
3.
Rev. Círc. Argent. Odontol ; 79(229): 9-17, abr. 2021. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1253242

ABSTRACT

La aparición de aparatología preadjustada ha colaborado en la efectividad de los tratamientos de ortodoncia, pero para que la expresión de esta aparatología se logre, es necesario una correcta colocación de los brackets y la permanencia de estos en boca durante todo el tratamiento. La precisión en la colocación mejora con la técnica de cementado indirecta, ya que permite el acceso a las zonas posteriores, a lugares donde se ve disminuida la visión y además disminuye la condensación de aliento y contaminación salival. Si bien esta técnica requiere tiempo extra de laboratorio, es más rápida en la etapa clínica (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Silicone Elastomers , Cementation/methods , Orthodontic Brackets , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Research Design , Schools, Dental , Acid Etching, Dental/instrumentation , Efficacy , Dental Impression Technique , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Composite Resins , Models, Dental
4.
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1155012

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the difference of chemical bonds between urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) bonding agents with ethanol solvent and acetone solvent on dentin collagen. Material and Methods: This experimental comparison study used three groups: G1 (Control): UDMA and collagen; G2: UDMA, collagen and ethanol; and G3: UDMA, collagen and acetone. The groups were then pelleted and analysed with FTIR, then the peak value of carbonyl absorption band from each study group was calculated. The result of FTIR analysis and the peak of carbonyl absorption band (P) was calculated using the formula: P = (BC / AB) X 100; AB. BC is measured in centimeters. The study of chemical bond differences between ethanol-solvent UDMA agents compared with acetone-solvent on dentin collagen resulted in a graph of peak of carbonyl absorption bands of UDMA and dentin collagen groups. To determine the chemical bonds of UDMA from the top of the carbonyl ester absorption bands with wavenumber absorption in range 1700-1750 cm-1, the decreasing peak of the carbonyl absorption bands is assumed as more chemical bonds that formed. Data were analysed using Anova one way and Tukey HSD test. Results: There were significant differences between the three study groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: UDMA bonding agents' chemical bonds with acetone solvent are much higher than the chemical bonds between UDMA bonding agents with ethanol solvent on dentin collagen.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Materials , Dentin , Ethanol/chemistry , Solvents/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Collagen/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Indonesia
5.
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1346674

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the scientific evidence on direct and indirect bonding techniques to analyse the differences related to treatment time, number of appointments and number of bracket detachments. Material and Methods: The MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched through to March 2021. Reference lists from the retrieved publications were also examined. The following article types that described data on the different types of direct and indirect bonding techniques in orthodontics were included: prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCCTs). Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and ascertained the quality of the studies. Results: The search strategy initially resulted in 824 articles, and after a careful selection comprising the inclusion criteria, 12 articles were picked for the final review, specifically 2 cohort studies, 4 case-control studies and 6 RCCTs. The methodological quality was low in 4 studies, medium in 2, and high in 6 articles. Conclusion: The evidence currently available suggests that the use of computer-aided bonding is related to a reduction in treatment time and the number of appointments compared to direct and manual indirect bonding. However, the total bonding time for computer-aided bonding technique, including digital bracket placement, was longer than for direct bonding. Further high-quality RCTs on the differences between direct and indirect bonding are necessary to determine more precise data, as well as additional advantages and disadvantages.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Dental Materials , Methods , Retrospective Studies , Italy
6.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 23(2): 68-74, Mar.-Apr. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-953021

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The purposes of this study were to present a prototype of a bracket-positioning gauge, which makes vertical inclination of the instrument difficult, allowing a reduction of vertical bracket positioning error, and to test its accuracy in bracket positioning by groups of individuals with different clinical experience and in specific groups of teeth. Methods: For the testing of the prototype, four groups of six participants each were used: Group 1 was composed of undergraduate students in the dental school, who had no previous experience in bonding orthodontic attachments; Group 2 was composed of orthodontic graduate students in the dental school; Group 3 consisted of orthodontists with a maximum of 5 years of clinical experience; Group 4 comprised orthodontists with more than 5 years of clinical experience. A typodont was simulated with a Class I crowded malocclusion, which reproduced the same occlusal characteristics for all groups to be bonded. All participants were instructed to bond 0.022×0.028-in Edgewise brackets on the labial surfaces of the upper and lower incisors, canines, and premolars at a height of 4 mm from the incisal edge or the labial cusp tip. Results: Only the mean value of Group 1 showed statistically significant difference in the comparison with the standard measurement. In the groups of teeth, the difference was significant for the premolar and incisor groups. Conclusion: Clinical experience interfered with the accuracy of vertical positioning of orthodontic attachments. As for the groups of teeth, premolars, followed by canines and incisors had the closest mean values to the standard measurement.


RESUMO Objetivos: os objetivos deste estudo foram apresentar um protótipo de posicionador de braquetes ortodônticos que dificulte a inclinação no sentido vertical, possibilitando a redução dos erros de altura no posicionamento desses acessórios; além de testar sua precisão na colagem, realizada por grupos de indivíduos com diferentes tempos de experiência clínica em Ortodontia e em grupos específicos de dentes. Métodos: para os testes do protótipo desenvolvido, quatro grupos de seis participantes foram formados. O Grupo 1 foi composto por alunos do curso de Odontologia sem qualquer prática com colagem em Ortodontia; o Grupo 2, por estudantes em Ortodontia; o Grupo 3, por ortodontistas com menos de cinco anos de experiência clínica; e o Grupo 4, por ortodontistas com mais de cinco anos de experiência clínica em Ortodontia. Em um typodont, foi simulada uma má oclusão Classe I com apinhamento, com as mesmas características para todas as colagens realizadas. Todos os participantes foram instruídos a colar braquetes Edgewise 0,022" x 0,028" na superfície vestibular dos incisivos, caninos e pré-molares superiores e inferiores, na altura de 4mm da borda incisal ou cúspide vestibular. Resultados: somente a média do Grupo 1 apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa na comparação com a medida padrão. Nos grupos de dentes, a diferença foi significativa para o grupo dos pré-molares e incisivos. Conclusão: o tempo de experiência clínica interferiu na precisão do posicionamento vertical do acessório ortodôntico e, quanto aos grupos de dentes, as médias mais próximas à medida padrão foram dos pré-molares, seguidas pelos caninos e incisivos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Orthodontics/instrumentation , Orthodontics, Corrective/instrumentation , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Orthodontics/methods , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Students, Dental , Bicuspid , Brazil , Dental Bonding/methods , Clinical Competence , Cuspid , Models, Dental , Education, Dental, Graduate , Equipment Design , Orthodontists , Incisor , Malocclusion/therapy
7.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 21(6): 43-50, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840195

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two methods of visual magnification (operating microscope and light head magnifying glass) for removal of composite flash around orthodontic metal brackets. Material and Methods: Brackets were bonded in the center of the clinical crown of sixty well-preserved human premolars. Half of the sample was bonded with conventional Transbond XT (3M Unitek TM, USA), whereas the other half was bonded with Transbond TM Plus Color Change (3M Unitek TM, USA). For each type of composite, the choice of method to remove the flash was determined by randomly distributing the teeth into the following subgroups: A (removal by naked eye, n = 10), B (removal with the aid of light head magnifying glass, under 4x magnification, n = 10), and C (removal with the aid of an operating microscope, under 40x magnification, n = 10). Brackets were debonded and teeth taken to a scanning electron microscope (SS-x-550, Shimadzu, Japan) for visualization of their buccal surface. Quantification of composite flash was performed with Image Pro Plus software, and values were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s post-hoc test at 5% significance level. Results: Removal of pigmented orthodontic adhesive with the aid of light head magnifying glass proved, in general, to be advantageous in comparison to all other methods. Conclusion: There was no advantage in using Transbond TM Plus Color Change alone. Further studies are necessary to draw a more definitive conclusion in regards to the benefits of using an operating microscope.


RESUMO Objetivo: este estudo teve o objetivo de avaliar a eficácia de dois métodos de magnificação visual (microscópio cirúrgico e lupa de pala) para remoção da resina residual em torno de braquetes ortodônticos metálicos. Material e Métodos: os braquetes foram colados no centro da coroa clínica de 60 pré-molares humanos bem preservados. Metade da amostra foi colada com Transbond XT convencional (3M UnitekTM, EUA), enquanto a outra metade foi colada com TransbondTM Plus Color Change (3M-UnitekTM, EUA). Para cada tipo de resina, a escolha do método para remover o resíduo foi determinada por meio da distribuição aleatória dos dentes nos seguintes subgrupos: A (remoção a olho nu, n = 10), B (remoção com a ajuda de lupa de pala, sob uma ampliação de 4x, n = 10) e C (remoção com auxílio de um microscópio cirúrgico, sob uma ampliação de 40x, n = 10). Os braquetes foram descolados e os dentes, levados a um microscópio eletrônico de varredura (SS-X-550, Shimadzu, Japão) para visualização de sua superfície vestibular. A quantificação da resina residual foi realizada por meio do software Image Pro Plus, onde os valores foram comparados utilizando-se o teste de Kruskal-Wallis e o teste post-hoc de Dunn, ao nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: a remoção da resina ortodôntica pigmentada com o auxílio da lente de aumento de pala provou, em geral, ser mais vantajosa, em comparação aos outros métodos testados. Conclusão: não houve vantagem em se usar a TransbondTM Plus Color Change sozinha. Estudos adicionais são necessários para se chegar a uma conclusão definitiva sobre os benefícios da utilização de microscópio cirúrgico.


Subject(s)
Humans , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Orthodontic Brackets , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Orthodontics, Corrective/instrumentation , Bicuspid , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Bonding/methods , Microscopy/instrumentation , Microscopy/methods
8.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e53, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952022

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of root canal fillings to root dentin using the reciprocating file-matched single-cone or lateral compaction techniques with resin-based and calcium-silicate-based sealers. Maxillary canine roots were prepared and filled using one of the following approaches: Reciproc R40 file and R40 single cone, WaveOne Large file and Large single cone, or ProTaper up to F4 file with lateral compaction. The root filling was performed using AH Plus, Epiphany SE or MTA Fillapex (n = 10). Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from each third of each root. Two slices were subjected to a push-out test, and the other slices were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine the dentin-sealer interface. Data (in MPa) from the push-out tests were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Failure modes (adhesive, cohesive or mixed) were evaluated at ×25 magnification. The single-cone techniques resulted in lower BS values than the lateral compaction technique. For lateral compaction, AH Plus and Epiphany SE showed the highest and lowest BS values, respectively. Slight differences were observed between sealers when the single-cone techniques were used. A tendency to reduce the BS toward the apical third was observed. Adhesive failures were predominant for all experimental conditions. A closer adaption of the filling material on the root dentin was observed for the AH Plus and lateral compaction techniques. The Reciproc and WaveOne techniques were associated with lower BS values than the lateral compaction technique. However, the effect of the root canal filling technique appears to be sealer-dependent.


Subject(s)
Humans , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Oxides/chemistry , Root Canal Obturation/instrumentation , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Surface Properties , Titanium/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Dental Bonding/methods , Silicates/chemistry , Calcium Compounds/chemistry , Aluminum Compounds/chemistry , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Dental Restoration Failure , Dentin/drug effects , Drug Combinations , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Equipment Design , Nickel/chemistry
9.
Rev. ADM ; 72(4): 203-208, jul.-ago. 2015. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-775320

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: comparar el sellado marginal y la adaptación interna que se obtiene en obturaciones directas mediante técnica convencional con resina de nanorrelleno y técnica de colocación ultrasónica con resinas de baja contracción de polimerización, usando cuatro tipos de adhesivos en preparaciones clase V de dientes extraídos. Material y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio experimental, comparativo y analítico en 32 dientes extraídos a los cuales se les realizó preparaciones clase V de 2 mm oclusogingival, 2 mm mesiodistal y 2 mm de profundidad. Se dividieron en dos grupos; en uno de ellos se obturó empleando técnica convencional y resina de nanorrelleno y en el otro se aplicó una técnica ultrasónica, usando resina de baja contracción. A su vez, cada grupo se subdividió en cuatro, usando diferentes adhesivos (OptiBond all in one Kerr TM , OptiBond Solo Plus Kerr TM , OptiBond FL Kerr TM y OptiBond XTR Kerr TM). Los dientes fueron cortados y analizados al microscopio de barrido (FEI Quanta 200 Scanning Electron Microscope). La información se analizó en el programa SPSS 17.0. Para comparar los grupos de estudio se empleó la prueba U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el sellado marginal y en la adaptación interna, siendo mejor la técnica de ultrasonido con resina de baja contracción de polimerización (p < 0.05). Con respecto al tipo de adhesivo utilizado, se encontraron diferencias significativas con OptiBond FL TM, el cual tuvo mejor interrelación (p < 0.05)


Objective: To compare the marginal sealing and internal adaptation obtained in direct restorations when using a conventional technique involving nano-filled resin vs. ultrasonic placement using low-polymerization shrinkage resins, and four different types of adhesives in class V preparations on extracted teeth. Material and methods:An experimental, comparative, analytical study was conducted on 32 extracted teeth with class V preparation (2 mmocclusogingival, 2 mm mesiodistal, and 2 mm depth). These were divided into 2 groups: one in which the teeth were restored using a conventional technique with nano-filled resin, and the other, in which an ultrasonic technique using a low-shrinkage resin was employed. In turn, each group was subdivided into 4 groups, in which different KerrTM adhesives were used (OptiBond All-In One, OptiBond Solo Plus, OptiBond FL, and...


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Ultrasonics/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning/methods , Polymerization/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Tooth Extraction
10.
J. appl. oral sci ; 23(4): 358-368, July-Aug. 2015. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-759366

ABSTRACT

AbstractResin-based cements have been frequently employed in clinical practice to lute indirect restorations. However, there are numerous factors that may compromise the clinical performance of those cements. The aim of this literature review is to present and discuss some of the clinical factors that may affect the performance of current resin-based luting systems. Resin cements may have three different curing mechanisms: chemical curing, photo curing or a combination of both. Chemically cured systems are recommended to be used under opaque or thick restorations, due to the reduced access of the light. Photo-cured cements are mainly indicated for translucent veneers, due to the possibility of light transmission through the restoration. Dual-cured are more versatile systems and, theoretically, can be used in either situation, since the presence of both curing mechanisms might guarantee a high degree of conversion (DC) under every condition. However, it has been demonstrated that clinical procedures and characteristics of the materials may have many different implications in the DC of currently available resin cements, affecting their mechanical properties, bond strength to the substrate and the esthetic results of the restoration. Factors such as curing mechanism, choice of adhesive system, indirect restorative material and light-curing device may affect the degree of conversion of the cement and, therefore, have an effect on the clinical performance of resin-based cements. Specific measures are to be taken to ensure a higher DC of the luting system to be used.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Hardness , Photochemical Processes , Self-Curing of Dental Resins/methods , Time Factors
11.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 18(6): 51-57, Nov.-Dec. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the time spent for direct (DBB - direct bracket bonding) and indirect (IBB - indirect bracket bonding) bracket bonding techniques. The time length of laboratorial (IBB) and clinical steps (DBB and IBB) as well as the prevalence of loose bracket after a 24-week follow-up were evaluated. METHODS: Seventeen patients (7 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 21 years, requiring orthodontic treatment were selected for this study. A total of 304 brackets were used (151 DBB and 153 IBB). The same bracket type and bonding material were used in both groups. Data were submitted to statistical analysis by Wilcoxon non-parametric test at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Considering the total time length, the IBB technique was more time-consuming than the DBB (p < 0.001). However, considering only the clinical phase, the IBB took less time than the DBB (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.910) for the time spent during laboratorial positioning of the brackets and clinical session for IBB in comparison to the clinical procedure for DBB. Additionally, no difference was found as for the prevalence of loose bracket between both groups. CONCLUSION: the IBB can be suggested as a valid clinical procedure since the clinical session was faster and the total time spent for laboratorial positioning of the brackets and clinical procedure was similar to that of DBB. In addition, both approaches resulted in similar frequency of loose bracket.


OBJETIVO: avaliar o tempo necessário para realização da colagem de braquetes pelas técnicas direta (CDB) e indireta (CIB), mensurando o tempo despendido entre a parte laboratorial (CIB) e a parte clínica (CDB e CIB), e a prevalência de descolamentos durante o período de observação de 24 semanas. MÉTODOS: dezessete pacientes (7 homens e 10 mulheres), com idade média de 21 anos, com necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico, foram selecionados para participar desse estudo. Foram utilizados um total de 304 braquetes, sendo que 151 foram colados pela técnica de CDB e 153 pela CIB, com o mesmo tipo de braquete e material de colagem. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste não paramétrico de Wilcoxon, com significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: o tempo total para realização da CIB foi maior em relação à CDB (p < 0,001). Levando em consideração apenas a fase clínica, foi observado que o tempo para CIB foi menor em relação a CDB (p < 0,001). A comparação entre o tempo despendido para o posicionamento dos braquetes em laboratório mais o tempo em clínica para CIB com o tempo em clínica para a CDB revelou que não houve diferença significativa (p = 0,910), nem tampouco quanto à prevalência de descolamento dos braquetes. CONCLUSÃO: a CIB apresenta-se como uma utilidade clínica singular, pois o tempo em clínica foi menor que o da CDB. O tempo despendido no posicionamento dos braquetes no laboratório e de execução clínica da CIB foi semelhante ao tempo gasto pela CDB, a quantidade de descolamentos foi semelhante entre as técnicas.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Dental Bonding/methods , Orthodontic Brackets , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Adhesives/chemistry , Models, Dental , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Equipment Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Laboratories, Dental , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Silicones/chemistry , Time Factors
12.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 18(6): 112-116, Nov.-Dec. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: development of a new device to be coupled to light-curing units for bonding orthodontic brackets and accessories, and test its efficacy in an in vitro mechanical trial. The inner surface of the device is mirrored and is based on physical concepts of light refraction and reflection. The main advantage of such device is the reduced clinical time needed for bonding and the low possibility of contamination during the process. METHODS: One hundred and twenty specimens were used for testing the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with the device. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also determined. The sample was divided into 2 groups. In group 1 a halogen light-curing unit was used while in group 2 a led light-curing unit was used. Each group was then subdivided. In subgroups H1 and L1, a conventional light guide rod was used while in subgroups H2 and L2 bonding was performed with the mirrored device coupled to the tip of the guide light rod. RESULTS: The values obtained for the shear bond strength and the ARI in the subgroups were compared. Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference for the shear strength (p > 0.05) and the ARI (p > 0.05) between the subgroups. CONCLUSION: The tests of mechanical trials and the ARI analysis showed that the new device fulfilled the requirements for bonding orthodontic accessories, and that the time for bonding was reduced to half, being necessary only one light exposure.


OBJETIVO: desenvolver uma nova ponteira para ser acoplada aos aparelhos fotopolimerizadores utilizados para colagem de braquetes e acessórios ortodônticos, e testar sua da efetividade em ensaio mecânico in vitro. A ponteira é espelhada na superfície interna e baseia-se em conceitos físicos de refração e reflexão de luz. Apresenta como principal vantagem o menor tempo clínico durante o procedimento de colagem, reduzindo a possibilidade de contaminação durante o processo. MÉTODOS: por meio de ensaio de resistência ao cisalhamento e determinação do índice remanescente de adesivo (IRA), testou-se a ponteira desenvolvida em 120 corpos de prova. A amostra foi dividia em dois grupos. No grupo 1, foi utilizado aparelho fotopolimerizador de fonte de luz halógena e, no grupo 2, fonte de LED. Cada grupo foi subdividido. Nos subgrupos H1 e L1, utilizou-se a ponteira convencional. Nos subgrupos H2 e L2 a colagem foi feita utilizando a ponteira desenvolvida para a polimerização do material de colagem. RESULTADOS: os valores dos testes de cisalhamento e IRA para os subgrupos foram comparados entre si. Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa para o ensaio de resistência ao cisalhamento (p > 0,05) nem para o IRA (p > 0,05) entre os subgrupos. CONCLUSÃO: os testes de ensaio mecânico, assim como a análise do IRA, mostraram que a nova ponteira desenvolvida cumpriu os requisitos necessários à colagem dos acessórios ortodônticos, e que o tempo de colagem foi reduzido pela metade, sendo necessária uma só incidência.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesiveness , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Materials Testing , Optical Fibers , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Time Factors
13.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 18(1): 31e1-31e6, Jan.-Feb. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-674257

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: LED light-curing devices seek to provide a cold light activator which allows protocols of material polymerization with shorter duration. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of bracket bonding using three types of light-curing devices: One with halogen light (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) and two with LEDs (Optilight CL - Gnatus and Elipar Freelight - 3M/ESPE). RESULTS: Comparing the results by analysis of variance, the Gnatus LED device showed an inferior statistical behavior in relation to other light sources, when activated by a short time. But, when it was used for 40 seconds, the polymerization results were consistent with the other evaluated sources. The device with the best average performance was the halogen light, followed by the 3M/ESPE LED. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the LEDs may be indicated in orthodontic practice, as long as a protocol is used for the application of light with the activation time of 40 seconds.


INTRODUÇÃO: os aparelhos de fotopolimerização por LED buscam proporcionar uma luz ativadora fria, que possibilite protocolos de polimerização do material com menor tempo de duração. OBJETIVO: avaliar a resistência à tração da colagem de braquetes, utilizando três tipos de aparelhos fotoativadores: um de luz halógena (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) e outros dois de LED (Optilight CL - Gnatus; e Elipar Freelight - 3M/Espe). RESULTADOS: comparando os resultados por meio da análise de variância, o aparelho de LED Gnatus apresentou comportamento estatístico inferior em relação às outras fontes de luz, quando ativado por tempo reduzido. Já quando foi utilizado o tempo de 40 segundos, os resultados de polimerização foram compatíveis com as demais fontes avaliadas. O aparelho que apresentou melhor desempenho médio foi o de luz halógena, seguido pelo LED 3M/Espe. CONCLUSÃO: concluiu-se que os LEDs podem ser indicados na prática ortodôntica, uma vez que seja utilizado um protocolo de aplicação da luz com tempo de ativação de 40 segundos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Resin Cements/chemistry , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Bicuspid , Materials Testing/methods , Polymerization , Shear Strength , Tensile Strength
14.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-145789

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the push-out bond strength of two surface treatments of a glass fiber and zirconia ceramic post. Materials and Methods: Sixty samples were fabricated and divided into two main groups according to the type of esthetic post indicated for maxillary central incisor: glass fiber post and zirconia ceramic post. Each group was subdivided to two subgroups according to the type of bond strength test either between post and root or between post and core. Each subgroup was further subdivided into three classes according to surface treatment: no treatment (control), sandblasting in conjunction with silica particles then silane coating (SB+SIC+SC), etching using hydrofluoric acid then silane coating (E+SC). For the subgroups of the bond strength between post and root, each class was subdivided into two subclasses according to the location of the sample (cervical or apical). Results: Bond strength to root canal or resin core were affected by the type of post, glass fiber post recorded significant higher bond strength than zirconia ceramic. Surface treatment recorded higher values for bond strength, SB+SIC+SC gave higher bond strength than E+SC. Cervical section recorded significant higher bond strength than apical section. Conclusions: Glass fiber posts recorded higher bond strength than glass ceramic post to both root canal and resin core. Surface treatments increase bond strength for glass fiber and zirconia ceramic posts to both root canal and resin core. SB+SIC+SC gave higher bond strength than E+SC. Bond strength at the cervical section is higher than at the apical section.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Composite Resins , Compressive Strength , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Materials , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Dental Stress Analysis , Glass , Humans , Materials Testing , Post and Core Technique , Zirconium
15.
Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent ; 97(5): 409-414, oct.-dic. 2009. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-552782

ABSTRACT

La reciente aparición de cementos resinosos autoacondicionantes contribuyó a simplificar la técnica de cementación de restauraciones estéticas. Al igual que los adhesivos autoacondicionantes, pueden presentar problemas a la hora de acondicionar eficazmente los tejidos dentales. Mediante la utilización de réplicas observadas al microscopio electrónico de barrido se pudo determinar que este cemento acondiciona eficazmente tanto la dentina como el esmalte, mejorando su performance cuando se lo aplica bajo presión y, más aún, si se realiza un breve grabado ácido previo con ácido fosfórico al treinta y cinco por ciento.


Subject(s)
Dentin , Dental Enamel , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning/methods , Data Interpretation, Statistical
16.
Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent ; 97(3): 239-243, jun.-jul. 2009. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-532909

ABSTRACT

Los parámetros de estética dictados por la sociedad obligan a las personas a buscar cada vez más, armonía dentofacial. En consecuencia, se incrementó el número de tratamientos estéticos relacionados a cambios de forma, posición y color de los dientes. Una alteración estética de etiología múltiple, encontrada frecuentemente en la clínica odontológica, y que a menudo afecta la composición dentofacial, es el diastema anterior. La evolución...


Subject(s)
Diastema/etiology , Diastema/therapy , Esthetics, Dental , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth Attrition/etiology , Color , Matrix Bands , Tooth Preparation/methods , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Composite Resins/chemistry
17.
Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent ; 97(1): 15-21, ene.-mar. 2009. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-526535

ABSTRACT

La reciente aparición de resinas compuestas en base a sistemas resinosos que se polimerizan por apertura de anillos (siloranos) que contraen menos del 1 por ciento y su sistema adhesivo compatible autoacondicionante (Adper-Silorano), vienieron a mejorar la integridad marginal de la restauración. Con la ayuda de la microscopía electrónica de barrido se comprobó al menos que este nuevo sistema penetra los tejidos dentarios y permite una estabilidad de la interfase de unión sin la formación de grietas. Serán necesarias investigaciones complementarias bajo fuerzas de tracción y microfiltración.


Subject(s)
Dentin , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Bonding/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dentin/ultrastructure , Acid Etching, Dental/instrumentation , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning/methods
19.
Braz. oral res ; 18(3): 253-259, jul.-set. 2004. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-383289

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar quantitativamente a microinfiltração em cavidades classe V restauradas com a utilização de sistemas adesivos de frasco único e autocondicionante com e sem a realização de condicionamento ácido prévio. Dois sistemas adesivos de frasco único, Single Bond e Prime & Bond 2.1, e um sistema adesivo autocondicionante, Clearfil Mega Bond, foram utilizados. Cento e vinte pré-molares humanos hígidos foram divididos em seis grupos, e vinte restaurações classe V foram preparadas na dentina radicular para avaliar cada sistema adesivo. Cada sistema adesivo foi utilizado com e sem condicionamento ácido. Os espécimes foram preparados, corados com azul de metileno a 2%, seccionados, triturados e avaliados em espectrofotometria para quantificar o corante infiltrado. Os dados foram submetidos a ANOVA e ao teste de Tukey-Kramer. Nenhuma diferença estatística significativa foi encontrada entre os sistemas adesivos quando o condicionamento ácido não foi utilizado. No entanto, o sistema adesivo Single Bond demonstrou menores médias de microinfiltração comparadas às médias dos sistemas adesivos Clearfil Mega Bond e Prime & Bond 2.1 quando o condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% foi utilizado. Os sistemas adesivos Single Bond e Clearfil Mega Bond demonstraram o mesmo comportamento quando as recomendações do fabricante foram seguidas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Leakage , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Resin Cements , Analysis of Variance , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Dental Cavity Preparation/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Spectrophotometry
20.
Rev. ADM ; 57(2): 65-71, mar.-abr. 2000. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-268005

ABSTRACT

El cemento de ionómero de vidrio fue desarrollado en 1969 y presentado a la profesión dental en 1972. Las primeras versiones del cemento presentaban algunas características indeseables que hicieron que este material no fuera muy popular durante sus primeros años. Una muy notable investigación se ha llevado a cabo en los últimos 20 años que ha beneficiado a la profesión dental con un material con mejores propiedades físicas y muy buenas características de manejo


Subject(s)
Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/therapeutic use , Dental Materials , Glass Ionomer Cements/classification , Cermet Cements/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Fluorides/chemistry , Light , Dental Restoration, Permanent/instrumentation , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL